Manufacturing · Ohio

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc.

Youngstown, OH · ~91 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333992 · Youngstown, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/22
  • PHOTO Manufacturing Techno…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manufacturing Technology, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1 · 2022=1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

129 Manufacturing establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 22 Manufacturing employers in Ohio.

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. (91 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc.
Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. (91 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Taylor-Winfield Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2019 4.9 2.0 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2016 4.6 1.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333992 · OH · Youngstown

129 Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 276 employers in Youngstown, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing Technology, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PTR 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMET Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amada Miyachi America, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gahanna 825 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Columbus 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.E. Middleton Construction Main office 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Company 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Elizabeth Health Center 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Elizabeth Health Hospital 2,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Edison Company 832 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vallourec Star, LP 681 FTE
NAT-TCR Milford Plant 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Adkins Energy LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lynch Road Service Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sycamore Main 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0167 Albuquerque 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0404 Fort Worth 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vistar North Texas - 1026 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linde-Griffith Construction Co. 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.