Nursery with tree production (except for reforestation) · North Carolina

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg

Louisburg, NC · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursery with tree production (except for reforestation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg: 11.2 TCR = 248% of Nursery with tree production (except for reforestation) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg safety composite

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg: 8.9 → 12.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 22.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg's TCR rose 3.6 from 8.9 in 2016 to 12.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 22.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111421 · Louisburg, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 248% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO 3417_6605
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3417_6605 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg averages 11.2 TCR (248% of the Nursery with tree production (except for reforestation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=19.7 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=12 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=22 · 2024=12.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg falls in its industry

386 Nursery with tree production ( establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Nursery with tree production ( employers in North Carolina.

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg (39 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg
Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg (39 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg has fewer employees than the Nursery with tree production (except for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.5 10.0 5 0 0
2023 22.0 22.0 7 0 0
2022 12.5 12.5 5 0 0
2021 4.5 2.3 4 0 0
2020 12.0 7.2 3 2 0
2019 6.4 4.3 3 0 0
2018 19.7 4.4 6 3 0
2017 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2016 8.9 6.7 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111421 · NC · Louisburg

386 Nursery with tree production (except for reforestation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 23 employers in Louisburg, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3417_6605 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR McKenzie Farms 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bailey Nurseries, Inc. 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yakima Chief Ranches 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE B & S Farming, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jeffery C Lee Farms, INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sullivan Farms Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSC - Wake Forest 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1953 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1953 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin Oaks Nursing & Rehabiitation 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eagle Peak LTC Group, LLC d/b/a Franklin Oaks Nursing & Rehabiitation 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Alter Metal Recycling - Behr Iron South Beloit - Fe Operations 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bjerk Builders, LLC 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR GVFS-Yard 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MediLodge of Gaylord 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stuckey Construction 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bodensteinter Implement Company - Elkader Location 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Depot #6057 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spicer Plus Inc 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.