Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Colorado

Tech Park Campus

Fort Collins, CO · ~371 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tech Park Campus runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade C.

Tech Park Campus: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tech Park Campus safety composite

Tech Park Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tech Park Campus held a steady TCR band

Tech Park Campus's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Fort Collins, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO Syngenta Greensboro
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~371 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Syngenta Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Tech Park Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tech Park Campus averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tech Park Campus TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Tech Park Campus falls in its industry

319 Physical science research and establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Physical science research and employers in Colorado.

Tech Park Campus (371 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Tech Park Campus
Tech Park Campus (371 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Tech Park Campus has more employees than the Physical science research and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · CO · Fort Collins

319 Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 268 employers in Fort Collins, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Syngenta Greensboro 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering Complex 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waymo HQ 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chamblee Campus 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Canyon Technologies - Crescent, LLC 371 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denver Office Area 370 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leprino Foods - FTM 370 FTE
STATE-SIZE DENVER CO (PECOS) 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poudre Valley Hospital 1,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Collins 1,285 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Belgium Brewing Company: Fort Collins 759 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodward Inc. - Lincoln Campus Facility 725 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eloy Detention 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adams County, Ms 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maui at Wailea (AZ) 371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market Basket Warehouse #990 371 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.