Machine shops · Pennsylvania

Technical Process & Engineering Inc

Lehighton, PA · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Technical Process & Engineering Inc runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Machine shops workplace, earning a grade A.

Technical Process & Engineering Inc: 1.3 TCR = 39% of Machine shops BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Technical Process & Engineering Inc safety composite

Technical Process & Engineering Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Technical Process & Engineering Inc held a steady TCR band

Technical Process & Engineering Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332710 · Lehighton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/177
  • PHOTO Southern Machine & F…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southern Machine & Fabrication Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Technical Process & Engineering Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Technical Process & Engineering Inc averages 1.3 TCR (39% of the Machine shops BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Technical Process & Engineering Inc TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Technical Process & Engineering Inc falls in its industry

1,821 Machine shops establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 177 Machine shops employers in Pennsylvania.

Technical Process & Engineering Inc (26 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Technical Process & Engineering Inc
Technical Process & Engineering Inc (26 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Technical Process & Engineering Inc has fewer employees than the Machine shops median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332710 · PA · Lehighton

1,821 Machine shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 34 employers in Lehighton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southern Machine & Fabrication Company, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Digital Machining Systems LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR QP Mfg 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR One Source Manufacturing Headquarters 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE JB Muhsroom Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Liberty 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy Center Harrisburg LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regency at Yardley 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gnaden Huetten Memorial Hospital 710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Mountain Hospital 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2169 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2169 352 FTE
NAT-TCR Erie Materials Binghamton 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Panama Transfer Panama 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Walsh Timber Company 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tom Sanders Building Mart LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Snack Foods Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allegany County Detention Center 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 9552 - Tamarac 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 7996 - Janitrol Rd 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.