Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Ohio

Technifab Inc.

Avon, OH · ~220 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Technifab Inc. runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Technifab Inc.: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Technifab Inc. safety composite

Technifab Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Technifab Inc. injury rate improved

Technifab Inc.'s TCR fell 1.4 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Avon, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/37
  • PHOTO Accurus Aerospace Tu…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~220 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Accurus Aerospace Tulsa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Technifab Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Technifab Inc. averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Technifab Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3 · 2019=2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Technifab Inc. falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 37 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Ohio.

Technifab Inc. (220 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Technifab Inc.
Technifab Inc. (220 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Technifab Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2019 2.0 1.7 7 0 0
2018 3.0 1.8 10 0 0
2017 3.1 2.8 9 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OH · Avon

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 83 employers in Avon, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Accurus Aerospace Tulsa 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thomas Global Systems, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steelville Manufacturing Co. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CFD International, LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE JLJI Enterprises INC 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strongsville 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nehemiah Manfucaturing CO. 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amcor Rigid Packaging 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avon Hospital 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Avon Hospital 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems, LLC - Avon 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richard E. Jacobs Health Center 497 FTE
NAT-TCR Storey County 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinic- Roundrock Region 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SRT Communications, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JB Industries 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hillcrest Health & Rehab 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10451 Marlboro 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10103 Roosevelt Square 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10238 Potrero Hill 220 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.