Solar power structure construction · California

Teichert Construction Solar Division

Sacramento, CA · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Teichert Construction Solar Division runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Solar power structure construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Teichert Construction Solar Division: 2.4 TCR = 86% of Solar power structure construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Teichert Construction Solar Division safety composite

Teichert Construction Solar Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2019→2022

Teichert Construction Solar Division injury rate improved

Teichert Construction Solar Division's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.7 in 2019 to 1.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 86% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #73/147
  • PHOTO Telamon Corporation …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Telamon Corporation - Rolling Meadows (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Teichert Construction Solar Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Teichert Construction Solar Division averages 2.4 TCR (86% of the Solar power structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Teichert Construction Solar Division TCR series: 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Teichert Construction Solar Division falls in its industry

1,605 Solar power structure construc establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 147 Solar power structure construc employers in California.

Teichert Construction Solar Division (60 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Teichert Construction Solar Division
Teichert Construction Solar Division (60 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Teichert Construction Solar Division has fewer employees than the Solar power structure construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Sacramento

1,605 Solar power structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Telamon Corporation - Rolling Meadows 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunstall Inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sustainable Energy Developments Inc. (DBA GreenSpark Solar) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA010 - Pauley Construction - Brighton 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Coast Vineyards 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paiva Farm Management 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocket Farms Herbs Inc Thermal 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Messer 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Elbex Corp. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Lubricants 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Founders Brewing - 235 Grandville 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fox Negaunee 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZDOD 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Campbell Landscape Services 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liquid Transport, Inc.- GA Location 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.