Diodes, solid-state (e.g., germanium, silicon), manufacturing · California

Teledyne Imaging Sensors

Camarillo, CA · ~201 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Teledyne Imaging Sensors runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Diodes, solid-state (e.g., germanium, silicon), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Teledyne Imaging Sensors: 1.8 TCR = 53% of Diodes, solid-state (e.g., germanium, silicon), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Teledyne Imaging Sensors safety composite

Teledyne Imaging Sensors scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2024

Teledyne Imaging Sensors injury rate improved

Teledyne Imaging Sensors's TCR fell 1.6 from 2.1 in 2018 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.1 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Camarillo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #94/128
  • PHOTO Analog Devices, Inc.…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Analog Devices, Inc. Camas Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Teledyne Imaging Sensors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Teledyne Imaging Sensors averages 1.8 TCR (53% of the Diodes, solid-state (e.g., germanium, silicon), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Teledyne Imaging Sensors TCR series: 2018=2.1 · 2019=3 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Teledyne Imaging Sensors falls in its industry

437 Diodes, solid-state (e.g., ger establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 128 Diodes, solid-state (e.g., ger employers in California.

Teledyne Imaging Sensors (201 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Teledyne Imaging Sensors
Teledyne Imaging Sensors (201 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Teledyne Imaging Sensors has fewer employees than the Diodes, solid-state (e.g., germanium, si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 2 3 0
2021 3.1 3.1 3 4 0
2020 0.5 0.0 0 1 0
2019 3.0 2.5 6 0 0
2018 2.1 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · CA · Camarillo

437 Diodes, solid-state (e.g., germanium, silicon), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Camarillo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Analog Devices, Inc. Camas Site 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR North East Silicon Technologies Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 403-Boise Exchange Street 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2 Elizabeth 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harris Ranch Feeding Company 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE MALAGA BUILDING D 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE AM Ortega Construction Inc. 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-09 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 558 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State University Channel Islands 1,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Channel Islands Social Services 1,488 FTE
NAT-TCR Wichita 10263 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Whirlpool 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR IWG High Performance Conductors, Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CompuWeigh Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bailey Street Bakery LLC. 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Palm Bay 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6324 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pawll - Williamsport 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.