Computer cable sets (e.g., monitor, printer) manufacturing · Virginia

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline

Charlottesville, VA · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Computer cable sets (e.g., monitor, printer) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Computer cable sets (e.g., monitor, printer) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline safety composite

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline held a steady TCR band

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Charlottesville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO PINNER WIRE & CABLE,…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PINNER WIRE & CABLE, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Teledyne LeCroy Frontline averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Computer cable sets (e.g., monitor, printer) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Teledyne LeCroy Frontline falls in its industry

334 Computer cable sets (e.g., mon establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Computer cable sets (e.g., mon employers in Virginia.

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline (33 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Teledyne LeCroy Frontline
Teledyne LeCroy Frontline (33 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Teledyne LeCroy Frontline has fewer employees than the Computer cable sets (e.g., monitor, prin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · VA · Charlottesville

334 Computer cable sets (e.g., monitor, printer) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 269 employers in Charlottesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PINNER WIRE & CABLE, INC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kauffman Engineering, LLC - CMB 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ensurge Micropower Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 2 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Commonwealth Gin 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALTAVISTA POWER STATION 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Mecklenburg 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orsted - Charlottesville 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia 11,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Of Virginia (209) Health System 10,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia Medical Center 8,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Ft. Lauderdale Weston 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Koch Foods Breeder/Broilers Techs 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR A Finishing Touch 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Salisbury/Wilmington HVAC 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tri State Oil Reclaimers 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Simonian Fruit Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE K Cunningham Construction Co., Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.