Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Texas

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station

Long Branch, TX · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade B.

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station: 0.7 TCR = 55% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station safety composite

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station held a steady TCR band

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Long Branch, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/86
  • PHOTO Blythe Energy Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blythe Energy Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tenaska Gateway Generating Station averages 0.7 TCR (55% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Tenaska Gateway Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 86 Electric power generation, fos employers in Texas.

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station (28 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tenaska Gateway Generating Station
Tenaska Gateway Generating Station (28 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Tenaska Gateway Generating Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Long Branch

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blythe Energy Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandywine 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PT ARTH SABINE 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kendall Energy Facility 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Axon 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1000 - BELFOR Birmingham MI 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Pittsburgh Airport Settlers Ridge 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gatlin Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rayco Roof Service, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - TCS 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ward Trucking LLC-Winchester 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.