Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Texas

Terex Utilities (Field Service)

San Antonio, TX · ~55 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Terex Utilities (Field Service) runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade B.

Terex Utilities (Field Service): 1.2 TCR = 55% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Terex Utilities (Field Service) safety composite

Terex Utilities (Field Service) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Terex Utilities (Field Service): 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Terex Utilities (Field Service)'s TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 2.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.2 · 55% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #70/292
  • PHOTO Mustang Machinery Co…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mustang Machinery Company, LLC dba Mustang Cat (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Terex Utilities (Field Service) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Terex Utilities (Field Service) averages 1.2 TCR (55% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Terex Utilities (Field Service) TCR series: 2022=0 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Terex Utilities (Field Service) falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 292 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Texas.

Terex Utilities (Field Service) (55 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Terex Utilities (Field Service)
Terex Utilities (Field Service) (55 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Terex Utilities (Field Service) has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · San Antonio

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mustang Machinery Company, LLC dba Mustang Cat 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBHymac 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Higgs Welding - New Shop 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR EthosEnergy TC, Inc. 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CHAMPION FEEDERS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SANTA GERTRUDIS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWISHER COUNTY CATTLE COMPANY 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harwood Complex 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR US Pack, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Richwood Industries 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Louisiana Christian University 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1425 TGIF Dickson City 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gateck Logistics Solutions 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE All In Express Inc 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metrie Distibution - Chicago 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Book Company - Terre Haute 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.