Recyclable material collection services · Texas

Texas - Non Metals

San Antonio, TX · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Texas - Non Metals runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Recyclable material collection services workplace, earning a grade D.

Texas - Non Metals: 4.7 TCR = 180% of Recyclable material collection services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Texas - Non Metals safety composite

Texas - Non Metals scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

Texas - Non Metals injury rate improved

Texas - Non Metals's TCR fell 3.9 from 7.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2017=10.5 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 180% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #81/117
  • PHOTO S04199 - Raleigh Hau…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S04199 - Raleigh Hauling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Texas - Non Metals in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Texas - Non Metals averages 4.7 TCR (180% of the Recyclable material collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Texas - Non Metals TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=10.5 · 2018=3 · 2019=3 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.6

Where Texas - Non Metals falls in its industry

2,322 Recyclable material collection establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 117 Recyclable material collection employers in Texas.

Texas - Non Metals (28 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Texas - Non Metals
Texas - Non Metals (28 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Texas - Non Metals has fewer employees than the Recyclable material collection services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2020 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 10.5 7.9 3 1 0
2016 7.4 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · TX · San Antonio

2,322 Recyclable material collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S04199 - Raleigh Hauling 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 115 - Palm Beach 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GFL Environmental USA Inc. - Wayne, MI 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GFL Solid Waste Midwest LLC- New London HC 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Ferguson Construction Company - Indiana 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Frontline Building Products Inc 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Onslow Memorial Hospital Main 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Prestress Services Industries Decatur 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE XRQ 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE XHC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE UPI 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE NMA 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.