Landscaping services (except planning) · Texas

TexaScapes - Yard

Austin, TX · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TexaScapes - Yard runs at 371% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscaping services (except planning) workplace, earning a grade F.

TexaScapes - Yard: 16.7 TCR = 371% of Landscaping services (except planning) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TexaScapes - Yard safety composite

TexaScapes - Yard scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.5

2018→2024

TexaScapes - Yard injury rate improved

TexaScapes - Yard's TCR fell 14.5 from 29.2 in 2018 to 14.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 34.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=29.2 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=34.9 · 2022=11.0 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=14.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 371% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #183/187
  • PHOTO Ponderosa Tree Service
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ponderosa Tree Service (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

TexaScapes - Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TexaScapes - Yard averages 16.7 TCR (371% of the Landscaping services (except planning) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TexaScapes - Yard TCR series: 2018=29.2 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=34.9 · 2022=11 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=14.7 · BLS 4.5

Where TexaScapes - Yard falls in its industry

2,875 Landscaping services (except p establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #183 safest of 187 Landscaping services (except p employers in Texas.

TexaScapes - Yard (38 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate TexaScapes - Yard
TexaScapes - Yard (38 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

TexaScapes - Yard has fewer employees than the Landscaping services (except planning) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.7 4.9 6 0 0
2023 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2022 11.0 5.5 4 0 0
2021 34.9 21.5 11 2 0
2020 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2019 16.6 5.5 5 1 0
2018 29.2 15.9 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · TX · Austin

2,875 Landscaping services (except planning) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ponderosa Tree Service 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norcross 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bland Landscaping Co Inc. -Wake Forest 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR G&M Outdoor Services, LLC 16.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Schaller Corporation Plant 3 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Health Care Center 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0130 Seattle 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0747 Wilmington 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE SCC - 1340 Tully Rd, SJ 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Columbia 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Proliant Biologicals - Boone 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuken Brothers Company- Emerson 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.