Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Tennessee

The Arbors at the Etheridge House

Union City, TN · ~19 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Arbors at the Etheridge House runs at 393% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Arbors at the Etheridge House: 14.9 TCR = 393% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Arbors at the Etheridge House safety composite

The Arbors at the Etheridge House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Arbors at the Etheridge House: 15.6 → 31.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 31.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.09× in 2024

The Arbors at the Etheridge House's TCR rose 15.6 from 15.6 in 2016 to 31.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Union City, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 393% of ind

  • DART 31.2 DART
  • RANK #96/100
  • PHOTO Auberge at Missoula …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auberge at Missoula Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

The Arbors at the Etheridge House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Arbors at the Etheridge House averages 14.9 TCR (393% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Arbors at the Etheridge House TCR series: 2016=15.6 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=31.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Arbors at the Etheridge House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

The Arbors at the Etheridge House (19 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Arbors at the Etheridge House
The Arbors at the Etheridge House (19 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Arbors at the Etheridge House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 31.2 31.2 4 0 0
2023 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2022 6.8 6.8 1 0 0
2016 15.6 7.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TN · Union City

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 44 employers in Union City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Missoula Valley 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY VERONICA DRIVE OPERATION LLC 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY CARDINAL DRIVE OPERATION LLC 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living - Crimson Ridge Meadows 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE PHOENIX GIN COMPANY 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Tennessee EMC - Covington 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Tennessee EMC - Jackson 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE LC SoBro, LLC 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Obion County Plant 1,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Sausage 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hickman Road Plant 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Memorial Hospital - Union City 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0682 Northbrook 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0734 Norcross 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0561 Boston 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0649 Towson 14.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.