Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · Massachusetts

The Arc of the South Shore

Hingham, MA · ~205 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Arc of the South Shore runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade D.

The Arc of the South Shore: 7.3 TCR = 192% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Arc of the South Shore safety composite

The Arc of the South Shore scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Arc of the South Shore: 4.3 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2023

The Arc of the South Shore's TCR rose 2.8 from 4.3 in 2021 to 7.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Hingham, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #39/74
  • PHOTO Koebel House
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~205 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Koebel House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Arc of the South Shore in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Arc of the South Shore averages 7.3 TCR (192% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Arc of the South Shore TCR series: 2021=4.3 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=7.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Arc of the South Shore falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 74 Intellectual and developmental employers in Massachusetts.

The Arc of the South Shore (205 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Arc of the South Shore
The Arc of the South Shore (205 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

The Arc of the South Shore has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.1 1.4 10 0 0
2022 10.4 3.0 14 0 0
2021 4.3 3.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MA · Hingham

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 41 employers in Hingham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Koebel House 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autism Learning Partners South Bay 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Range Center, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homes for Independent Living 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Supply New England 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-000000645 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pridestar EMS 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sancta Maria Nursing Facility 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linden Ponds 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hingham Manufacturing 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR McDonald Electrical Corp 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Russelectric, A Siemens Business 247 FTE
NAT-TCR NurseCore of Ventura 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Virgil & Brothers Inc 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Bagel Baking Corp 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Darien 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fabrizi Trucking & Paving Co., Inc. 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eden Prairie W 70th St 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prentke Romich Company 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheyenne Terminal-DOT 205 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.