Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) · Missouri

The Aviary Recovery Center

Eolia, MO · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
28.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Aviary Recovery Center runs at 752% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) workplace, earning a grade F.

The Aviary Recovery Center: 28.6 TCR = 752% of Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Aviary Recovery Center safety composite

The Aviary Recovery Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 26.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2021→2024

The Aviary Recovery Center injury rate improved

The Aviary Recovery Center's TCR fell 6.6 from 33.1 in 2021 to 26.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 33.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=33.1 · 2022=30.3 · 2023=24.3 · 2024=26.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621420 · Eolia, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 28.6 · 752% of ind

  • DART 26.5 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO Choate Mental Health…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Choate Mental Health and Developmental Center (1.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

The Aviary Recovery Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Aviary Recovery Center averages 28.6 TCR (752% of the Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Aviary Recovery Center TCR series: 2021=33.1 · 2022=30.3 · 2023=24.3 · 2024=26.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Aviary Recovery Center falls in its industry

611 Outpatient treatment centers a establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Outpatient treatment centers a employers in Missouri.

The Aviary Recovery Center (60 employees, TCR 28.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate The Aviary Recovery Center
The Aviary Recovery Center (60 employees, TCR 28.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1

The Aviary Recovery Center has fewer employees than the Outpatient treatment centers and clinics median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 26.5 26.5 0 11 0
2023 24.3 24.3 0 11 0
2022 30.3 30.3 0 9 0
2021 33.1 33.1 0 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621420 · MO · Eolia

611 Outpatient treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals) for substance abuse (i.e., alcoholism, drug addiction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Choate Mental Health and Developmental Center 27.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Light Wilderness 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Vision Wilderness 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palms Behavioral Health 18.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - O'Fallon 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Platte/Clay Electric Cooperative 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black River Electric Cooperative, Fredericktown Office 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE HERZOG CONTRACTING CORP - ASPHALT 60 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZUTI 28.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Coop Country Fruita 28.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-6250-OUTLETS 28.6 TCR
NAT-TCR East West Logistix 28.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE RLG - Oxford Graphics 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 031 Mayaguez Terrace 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 163511-New Milford | CT | 163511 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seneca Foods Oakfield 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.