Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

The Bridge at Longmont

Longmont, CO · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Bridge at Longmont runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Bridge at Longmont: 7.8 TCR = 205% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Bridge at Longmont safety composite

The Bridge at Longmont scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.7

2016→2024

The Bridge at Longmont injury rate improved

The Bridge at Longmont's TCR fell 14.7 from 14.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.7 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Longmont, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 205% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/140
  • PHOTO Elmhurst Commons Ass…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elmhurst Commons Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

The Bridge at Longmont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Bridge at Longmont averages 7.8 TCR (205% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Bridge at Longmont TCR series: 2016=14.7 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Bridge at Longmont falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

The Bridge at Longmont (41 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Bridge at Longmont
The Bridge at Longmont (41 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Bridge at Longmont has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 12.4 12.4 4 0 0
2022 10.9 3.6 3 0 0
2021 9.1 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.6 13.6 4 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 6.1 3.0 2 0 0
2016 14.7 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Longmont

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 182 employers in Longmont, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elmhurst Commons Assisted Living 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABBY CONWAY LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bungalows at Chesterfield Village 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cherry Wood Pointe Asst Lv 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colorado Beef 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilcrest Feedlot 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE TORTUGA AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montrose Maintenance Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longmont, CO 1,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longmont United Hospital 638 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-05500001-055001 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longs Peak Hospital 537 FTE
NAT-TCR Primrose of Mt. Pleasant 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Grays Harbor County 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Altenheim Senior Living 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Scaled Composites 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Byron 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso Fleet 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Hotel Sunnyvale Cupertino 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.