Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

The Bristal at Lake Success

Lake Success, NY · ~65 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Bristal at Lake Success runs at 351% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Bristal at Lake Success: 13.3 TCR = 351% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Bristal at Lake Success safety composite

The Bristal at Lake Success scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2023

The Bristal at Lake Success injury rate improved

The Bristal at Lake Success's TCR fell 4.2 from 11.5 in 2017 to 7.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 43.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.5 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=43.7 · 2023=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lake Success, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 351% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #247/283
  • PHOTO Residences at Greer
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Residences at Greer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Bristal at Lake Success in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Bristal at Lake Success averages 13.3 TCR (351% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Bristal at Lake Success TCR series: 2017=11.5 · 2020=2 · 2021=2 · 2022=43.7 · 2023=7.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Bristal at Lake Success falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #247 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

The Bristal at Lake Success (65 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Bristal at Lake Success
The Bristal at Lake Success (65 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Bristal at Lake Success has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.4 2.9 5 0 0
2022 43.7 8.7 5 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 11.5 2.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Lake Success

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 26 employers in Lake Success, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Residences at Greer 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FB-HHH2-SPRING ARBOR FREDERICKSBURG 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solheim Senior Community 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewood Reserve 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pearl Creek Management, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE John B Martin & Sons Farms, Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrell Dairy, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Hornell 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1111 Marcus Ave 3,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR 450 Lakeville Rd 1,527 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1991 Marcus Ave 1,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1979 Marcus Ave 508 FTE
NAT-TCR San Joaquin County Agricultural Department 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0035-0035-01459 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0024-0024-03493 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 240025-Bos-Wellesley Hills Br 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE STK 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nelson Agri-Center 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gjw, LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fargo Hilton Garden Inn 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.