Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

The Centennial House of Apple Valley

Apple Valley, MN · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Centennial House of Apple Valley runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Centennial House of Apple Valley: 8.1 TCR = 213% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Centennial House of Apple Valley safety composite

The Centennial House of Apple Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Centennial House of Apple Valley: 8.1 → 203.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 203.0 TCR · DART/TCR 12.56× in 2024

The Centennial House of Apple Valley's TCR rose 194.9 from 8.1 in 2023 to 203.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 12.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Apple Valley, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 213% of ind

  • DART 101.5 DART
  • RANK #117/226
  • PHOTO Manning Senior Living
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manning Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Centennial House of Apple Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Centennial House of Apple Valley averages 8.1 TCR (213% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Centennial House of Apple Valley TCR series: 2023=8.1 · 2024=203 · BLS 3.8

Where The Centennial House of Apple Valley falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Centennial House of Apple Valley (69 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Centennial House of Apple Valley
The Centennial House of Apple Valley (69 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Centennial House of Apple Valley has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 203.0 101.5 4 0 0
2023 8.1 4.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Apple Valley

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 91 employers in Apple Valley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manning Senior Living 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Hollywood 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wynnfield Crossing 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacifica Senior Living Ocala 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE WindLogics St. Paul 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Region Electric Cooperative 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Restoration Professionals, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field & Shop 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Apple Valley 880 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uponor - Apple Valley 682 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2390 - Apple Valley South 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2642 416 FTE
NAT-TCR Rahco Rubber Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Palan - Lancaster 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Summitt Trucking LLC 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Inn at the Pier 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE WCTX Associates LLC d/b/a Hilton Houston Westchase 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE W. A. Soefker & Son, Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canton 10236 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Eddy Pond West 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.