Custom roll forming metal products · Pennsylvania

The Charles Schillinger Co

Bensalem, PA · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Charles Schillinger Co runs at 341% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Custom roll forming metal products workplace, earning a grade F.

The Charles Schillinger Co: 11.2 TCR = 341% of Custom roll forming metal products BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Charles Schillinger Co safety composite

The Charles Schillinger Co scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Charles Schillinger Co: 12.8 → 18.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2024

The Charles Schillinger Co's TCR rose 6.1 from 12.8 in 2017 to 18.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332114 · Bensalem, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 341% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO Mid-Ohio Tubing, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mid-Ohio Tubing, LLC (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Charles Schillinger Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Charles Schillinger Co averages 11.2 TCR (341% of the Custom roll forming metal products BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Charles Schillinger Co TCR series: 2017=12.8 · 2018=17.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=10 · 2023=15.4 · 2024=18.9 · BLS 3.3

Where The Charles Schillinger Co falls in its industry

97 Custom roll forming metal prod establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Custom roll forming metal prod employers in Pennsylvania.

The Charles Schillinger Co (26 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Charles Schillinger Co
The Charles Schillinger Co (26 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 5.0

The Charles Schillinger Co has fewer employees than the Custom roll forming metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.9 3.1 6 0 0
2023 15.4 0.0 5 0 0
2022 10.0 3.3 3 0 0
2021 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 11.6 3.9 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 17.7 3.0 6 0 0
2017 12.8 6.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332114 · PA · Bensalem

97 Custom roll forming metal products employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 138 employers in Bensalem, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mid-Ohio Tubing, LLC 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Traverse City Products LLC 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASC Steel Deck 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WPSS - Paris, KY 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE JB Muhsroom Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Liberty 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy Center Harrisburg LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regency at Yardley 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Racing, Inc. 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Racing Management Co (DBA Parx Casino & Racing Inc) 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Refrigeration & A/C Products Inc., 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foley - Bensalem PA 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Omega Extruding Corp of CA 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mlc-Santa Ana 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St. Francis Medical Center Es 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cumberland Foundry Co., Inc. 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Olympic Systems Corporation 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gremp Steel Company 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE OH - General Dynamics 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenwood Store 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.