Retirement communities, continuing care · California

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC

Sacramento, CA · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC: 10.2 TCR = 269% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC safety composite

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2017→2022

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC injury rate improved

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC's TCR fell 6.3 from 6.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 25.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=25.2 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 269% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #120/216
  • PHOTO Northcrest Community…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northcrest Community, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC averages 10.2 TCR (269% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC TCR series: 2017=6.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=25.2 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 216 Retirement communities, contin employers in California.

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC (38 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC
The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC (38 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Chateau on Capitol Avenue LLC has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.3 10.3 2 1 0
2020 13.2 13.2 1 2 0
2019 25.2 22.1 8 0 0
2018 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2017 6.3 3.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Sacramento

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northcrest Community, Inc. 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Concord Place 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose of Tyler 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandel Manor 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-04313 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-02932 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 083434-Stg-Pawcatuck Br 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 120466-Atl-East Atlanta Sta 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plastimatic Arts Corporation d/b/a Pacbannerworks 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry County Services 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardrock Project 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palihouse Miami Beach 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.