Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing · Ohio

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company

Bedford Hts, OH · ~248 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company: 5.3 TCR = 161% of Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company safety composite

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company: 5.1 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2017

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company's TCR rose 0.5 from 5.1 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Bedford Hts, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 161% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #13/17
  • PHOTO C089 Memphis PC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~248 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C089 Memphis PC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company averages 5.3 TCR (161% of the Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company falls in its industry

516 Beverages, soft drink (includi establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Beverages, soft drink (includi employers in Ohio.

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company (248 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company
The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company (248 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

The Cleveland Coca-Cola Bottling Company has more employees than the Beverages, soft drink (including artific median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 5.6 3.7 12 0 0
2016 5.1 4.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · OH · Bedford Hts

516 Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 13 employers in Bedford Hts, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C089 Memphis PC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chester 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Epic Enterprises, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAUREL PKG (JOHNSTOWN) PA 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tiffin 248 FTE
STATE-SIZE Queensgate 248 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woeber Mustard Manufacturing 248 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mom's Meals North Jackson Kitchen 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Distribution Center - ABARTA Coca-Cola Beverages 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLE Gunton Corporation 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #6526 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Division 111 FTE
NAT-TCR 0432 - Blackwood, Nj 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Distribution Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NSK11 - North Sky - Sherwood 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Giffin Interior & Fixture Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spring Valley (Nyspv) 248 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tallahassee Center (Fltal) 248 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-ROA-ROANOKE-PD 248 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX.HOUST.406 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 248 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.