Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) · South Carolina

The Club CHS

North Charleston, SC · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Club CHS runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) workplace, earning a grade D.

The Club CHS: 5.3 TCR = 177% of Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Club CHS safety composite

The Club CHS scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Club CHS: 5.3 → 94.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 94.3 TCR · DART/TCR 17.73× in 2023

The Club CHS's TCR rose 89.0 from 5.3 in 2022 to 94.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 17.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · North Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 177% of ind

  • DART 94.3 DART
  • RANK #90/132
  • PHOTO Aquinas College
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aquinas College (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Club CHS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Club CHS averages 5.3 TCR (177% of the Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Club CHS TCR series: 2022=5.3 · 2023=94.3 · BLS 3.0

Where The Club CHS falls in its industry

6,952 Food service contractors, conc establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 132 Food service contractors, conc employers in South Carolina.

The Club CHS (22 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Club CHS
The Club CHS (22 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

The Club CHS has fewer employees than the Food service contractors, concession ope median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 94.3 94.3 1 1 0
2022 5.3 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · SC · North Charleston

6,952 Food service contractors, concession operator (e.g., convention facilities, entertainment facilities, sporting facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aquinas College 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fulton County Medical Center 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holmes Regional Med Ctr 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT HTM EINSTEIN HEALTH 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE Newberry Liquid Plant 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summerville SC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Business Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Redding, Ca #00023 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedmont College* 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Silver Tower Riverside Methodist Hospital 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 115 Triple Diamond Blvd., Nokomis, FL 34275 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Curtis Lumber Co. Inc. Ray Brook 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE RC General Contractors 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 102 - Gardena Branch 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 112 - San Bernardino Branch 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.