Intellectual and developmental disability homes · Nebraska

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha

Omaha, NE · ~72 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability homes workplace, earning a grade F.

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha: 8.2 TCR = 216% of Intellectual and developmental disability homes BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha safety composite

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2019→2020

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha injury rate improved

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha's TCR fell 7.0 from 11.7 in 2019 to 4.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.7 · 2020=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 216% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #15/21
  • PHOTO Sunnyhill Independen…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sunnyhill Independence Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha averages 8.2 TCR (216% of the Intellectual and developmental disability homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha TCR series: 2019=11.7 · 2020=4.7 · BLS 3.8

Where The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 21 Intellectual and developmental employers in Nebraska.

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha (72 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha
The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha (72 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Omaha has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.7 1.6 3 0 0
2019 11.7 8.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NE · Omaha

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sunnyhill Independence Center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCPLA - Chatsworth Facility 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springbrook NY Inc - Bird Ave 775 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard Park Chestnut Ridge 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brester Construction, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRADE WELL PALLET, INC. - GRETNA 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacha Soap Co 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diamond Plastics Corp - GI 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Golden Corral 584 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Main 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ambassador Steel-Menomonie Wisconsin 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HEC 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ernst Cobb CO Inc. Kennesaw 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmers Union Oil Company of Berthold/Carpio 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - Wood shop 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheboygan Paint Company - WI 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.