Skilled nursing facilities · New York

The Cottages at Garden Grove

Cicero, NY · ~190 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Cottages at Garden Grove runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Cottages at Garden Grove: 6.2 TCR = 95% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Cottages at Garden Grove safety composite

The Cottages at Garden Grove scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Cottages at Garden Grove held a steady TCR band

The Cottages at Garden Grove's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.0 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cicero, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.2 · 95% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #331/616
  • PHOTO Casas Adobes Post Ac…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Cottages at Garden Grove in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Cottages at Garden Grove averages 6.2 TCR (95% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Cottages at Garden Grove TCR series: 2016=5 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=7 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 6.5

Where The Cottages at Garden Grove falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #331 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

The Cottages at Garden Grove (190 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Cottages at Garden Grove
The Cottages at Garden Grove (190 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Cottages at Garden Grove has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 5.1 7 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 5 0 0
2022 4.3 4.3 5 0 0
2021 7.0 7.0 10 0 0
2020 7.7 7.0 11 1 0
2019 9.1 8.5 13 2 0
2018 7.2 6.6 11 1 0
2016 5.0 5.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Cicero

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 31 employers in Cicero, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehabilitation Center 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fortuna Rehabilitation and Wellness Center 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salmon Brook Center 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Care Center Zephyrhills North 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Millbrook ICF 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE GOOD SHEPHERD FAIRVIEW HOME 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lackawanna 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schofield Residence 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Village Inc 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5242 407 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cicero 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5242 352 FTE
NAT-TCR Fortuna Rehabilitation and Wellness Center 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dove Canyon Golf Club 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR COD018 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Christopher Heights of Marlborough 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Kapolei (Hanua), HI (DC) 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auria Holmesville LLC 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zuckerman Family Farms 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE American BD Company North 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.