Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In.

Charlotte, NC · ~351 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In.: 2.6 TCR = 68% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. safety composite

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In.: 0.3 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2023

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In.'s TCR rose 1.8 from 0.3 in 2020 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #12/105
  • PHOTO Camden Springs
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~351 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Camden Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. averages 2.6 TCR (68% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. TCR series: 2020=0.3 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. (351 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In.
The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. (351 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Cypress of Charlotte Club, In. has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 2.1 6 0 0
2022 5.3 5.3 13 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Charlotte

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Camden Springs 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Richardson 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broadway Services Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brightmore of Wilmington 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE DOT-Transportation 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coats American, Inc. 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE RPM Wood Finishes Group, Inc., Hudson, NC 351 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wieland Copper Products LLC 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Upfield Sourcing US Inc. - New Century 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Great American Deli LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JRT Trucking, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kubota Engine America 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern Region : Tgu 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milbank Manufacturing - Kansas City 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillcrest Hospital Claremore 351 FTE
NAT-SIZE Absolute Pipeline Integrity, LLC 351 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.