Skilled nursing facilities · Ohio

The Daniel Drake Center

Cincinnati, OH · ~607 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Daniel Drake Center runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

The Daniel Drake Center: 3.2 TCR = 49% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Daniel Drake Center safety composite

The Daniel Drake Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

The Daniel Drake Center injury rate improved

The Daniel Drake Center's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.9 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.2 · 49% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #218/1074
  • PHOTO Ambassador Centervil…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 92 inj
  • SIZE ~607 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ambassador Centerville Management LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Daniel Drake Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Daniel Drake Center averages 3.2 TCR (49% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Daniel Drake Center TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 6.5

Where The Daniel Drake Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 1074 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Ohio.

The Daniel Drake Center (607 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Daniel Drake Center
The Daniel Drake Center (607 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Daniel Drake Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.3 5 7 0
2023 2.9 2.2 11 2 0
2022 4.3 2.3 10 9 0
2021 3.4 2.9 13 2 0
2020 4.5 3.1 11 11 1
2019 2.7 1.7 13 1 0
2018 1.5 0.4 8 0 0
2016 3.9 2.6 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Cincinnati

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ambassador Centerville Management LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Health and Rehabilation 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Old Hickory Village 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampden Hills Post Acute 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE RMF Nooter LLC 607 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Gas Supply 607 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barberton Office 606 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belterra Park Gaming 606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Roy Rock LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilmer Warehouse Perry 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR APM Terminals Pacific LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Buda TX Panel 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sazerac Distillers, LLC d.b.a. The Glenmore Distillery 607 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Richland 607 FTE
NAT-SIZE HICKSVILLE-NY54 607 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital 607 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.