Building cleaning services, janitorial · Michigan

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools

Troy, MI · ~100 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade F.

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools: 11.8 TCR = 262% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools safety composite

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2021

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools injury rate improved

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools's TCR fell 2.4 from 8.6 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.6 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=15.6 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Troy, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 262% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #109/114
  • PHOTO PSSI / TYSON FOODS …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSSI / TYSON FOODS INC. - COLUMBUS JUNCTION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools averages 11.8 TCR (262% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=15.6 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=6.2 · BLS 4.5

Where The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 114 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Michigan.

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools (100 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools
The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools (100 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

The DM Burr Group - Troy Schools has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.2 6.2 5 0 0
2020 14.7 10.3 10 0 0
2019 15.6 11.1 14 0 0
2018 13.9 9.7 12 1 0
2017 8.6 6.4 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MI · Troy

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 237 employers in Troy, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSSI / TYSON FOODS INC. - COLUMBUS JUNCTION 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Service King 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BBB 15030 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT OLIVE VIEW UCLA MED CTR 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jay Dee Contractors, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solomon Plumbing Co 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE FiberClass Insulation 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eden Foods Headquarters 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-309 5,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Troy - Maple Road 1,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy - Maple Road 1,361 FTE
NAT-TCR PIT - Ground Ops 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Black and Gold Moving LLC West Series 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-West Glass Co. 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mco Jb 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of St Joseph 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE RI Terminal 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE IFS-CA-NorCal 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pollmann North America, Inc. 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.