Fuel oil (i.e., heating) dealers, direct selling · New York

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC

College Point, NY · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fuel oil (i.e., heating) dealers, direct selling workplace, earning a grade A.

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Fuel oil (i.e., heating) dealers, direct selling BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC safety composite

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 3.93× in 2024

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454310 · College Point, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #8/49
  • PHOTO Frank J Lamparelli O…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frank J Lamparelli Oil Co Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Energy Conservation Group, LLC averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Fuel oil (i.e., heating) dealers, direct selling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 3.4

Where The Energy Conservation Group, LLC falls in its industry

366 Fuel oil (i.e., heating) deale establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 49 Fuel oil (i.e., heating) deale employers in New York.

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC (46 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Energy Conservation Group, LLC
The Energy Conservation Group, LLC (46 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 6.1

The Energy Conservation Group, LLC has more employees than the Fuel oil (i.e., heating) dealers, direct median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454310 · NY · College Point

366 Fuel oil (i.e., heating) dealers, direct selling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 37 employers in College Point, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frank J Lamparelli Oil Co Inc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunrise Cooperative - Norwalk Energy 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quarles - Fredericksburg 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUPERIOR PLUS - 3109 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zuber Farms LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belltown Dairy 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL-VI Farms,LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hudson Valley Fish Farm Inc 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1150 - College Point 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHL USA, INC. -TEXAS LOCATION 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY_College Point_109-15 14th Ave_44000100 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1964-00130257 307 FTE
NAT-TCR Delta/Wauseon 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Health Center of Snohomish County - Administration 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisiana-Pacific Sagola 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Allison-Smith Co. - Georgia 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation - Magna 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interflex Group Wilkesboro Converting Building 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gay and Robinson, Inc 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.R. Forde Associates, Inc. 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.