Skilled nursing facilities · New Jersey

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas

Medford, NJ · ~379 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas: 9.0 TCR = 138% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas safety composite

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas injury rate improved

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas's TCR fell 1.6 from 9.0 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=17.2 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Medford, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.0 · 138% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #236/370
  • PHOTO Jacksonville Nursing…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 152 inj
  • SIZE ~379 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jacksonville Nursing and Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas averages 9.0 TCR (138% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=7 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=17.2 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 6.5

Where The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #236 safest of 370 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New Jersey.

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas (379 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas
The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas (379 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Estaugh T/A Medford Leas has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 6.1 15 2 0
2023 9.6 8.2 17 4 0
2022 17.2 16.7 13 26 0
2021 9.1 7.9 10 12 0
2020 7.0 7.0 9 9 0
2019 6.1 5.7 17 0 0
2018 9.1 8.4 28 0 0
2017 6.6 5.2 19 0 0
2016 9.0 7.5 24 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NJ · Medford

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 28 employers in Medford, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville Nursing and Rehab Center 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rehabilitation Center of Oakland 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northfield Parkview 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63209 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7218_16539 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7218_16623 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7218_16552 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5867 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARTER LUMBER 391 4,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medford Nursery, Inc - Medford 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Associated Cleaning Maintenance, LLC 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000007964 106 FTE
NAT-TCR Area Equipment, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westside Finishing Company Inc 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Products Company Inc 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgeport Hospital 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Campbellsville Plant 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE K07 ICT - Tullahoma 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solomon Kansas 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE LANXESS Corporation Headquarters 379 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.