Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · South Carolina

The Foothills Retirement Community

Columbia, SC · ~143 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Foothills Retirement Community runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Foothills Retirement Community: 10.5 TCR = 277% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Foothills Retirement Community safety composite

The Foothills Retirement Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−71.0

2019→2020

The Foothills Retirement Community injury rate improved

The Foothills Retirement Community's TCR fell 71.0 from 81.5 in 2019 to 10.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 81.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=81.5 · 2020=10.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Columbia, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 277% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #62/76
  • PHOTO American House - Par…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American House - Park Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Foothills Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Foothills Retirement Community averages 10.5 TCR (277% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Foothills Retirement Community TCR series: 2019=81.5 · 2020=10.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Foothills Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 76 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

The Foothills Retirement Community (143 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Foothills Retirement Community
The Foothills Retirement Community (143 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Foothills Retirement Community has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 10.5 3.2 3 10 0
2019 81.5 81.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · SC · Columbia

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American House - Park Place 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Thousand Oaks 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Vista Camanche 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Residences of Lecanto 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE J. Davis Inc 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC - SPARTANBURG - 6135 Anderson Mill Rd 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP Mid-Atlantic, LLC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1635 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Synergy Community Cooperative - Elk Mound Agronomy 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR GRS - Milford 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PCV 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-SATCX0UPS 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tradesmen International Philadelphia 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkvue Healthcare 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pryor Chemical Company 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swg South Ops Office 0021-Fac49 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.