Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

The Forum at Desert Harbor

Peoria, AZ · ~105 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Forum at Desert Harbor runs at 257% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Forum at Desert Harbor: 9.8 TCR = 257% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Forum at Desert Harbor safety composite

The Forum at Desert Harbor scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 37% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Forum at Desert Harbor: 0.7 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 18.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2024

The Forum at Desert Harbor's TCR rose 5.9 from 0.7 in 2019 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Peoria, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 257% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #100/173
  • PHOTO Bridges by Epoch at …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bridges by Epoch at Nashua (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

The Forum at Desert Harbor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Forum at Desert Harbor averages 9.8 TCR (257% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Forum at Desert Harbor TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=13 · 2023=18.6 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Forum at Desert Harbor falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

The Forum at Desert Harbor (105 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Forum at Desert Harbor
The Forum at Desert Harbor (105 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Forum at Desert Harbor has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 4.9 4 0 0
2023 18.6 13.5 11 0 0
2022 13.0 6.5 7 1 1
2021 10.1 8.8 7 1 0
2019 0.7 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Peoria

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 170 employers in Peoria, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bridges by Epoch at Nashua 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY DANVERS OPERATIONS LLC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Woodbury 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Westpark 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elephant Head Farms 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillphoenix AMS Phoenix 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tohono O O'dham Utility Authority 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Banicki Construction, Inc. (Div of Sterling Construction) 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rapid Recovery 2,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-507 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-506 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1533 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Tfo Tech Co., Ltd. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JABA Consultants Inc 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Exo-s Coldwater 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pleune Construction Division 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stellar Snacks 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardwoods of Missouri LLC 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harry Cooper Supply Company 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henrico Care Center LLC 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.