Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

The Forum at Tucson

Tucson, AZ · ~134 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Forum at Tucson runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Forum at Tucson: 8.1 TCR = 214% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Forum at Tucson safety composite

The Forum at Tucson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Forum at Tucson: 4.3 → 11.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

The Forum at Tucson's TCR rose 7.3 from 4.3 in 2019 to 11.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 214% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #75/173
  • PHOTO AX-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AX-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR APEX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

The Forum at Tucson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Forum at Tucson averages 8.1 TCR (214% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Forum at Tucson TCR series: 2019=4.3 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=14.1 · 2023=8.4 · 2024=11.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Forum at Tucson falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

The Forum at Tucson (134 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Forum at Tucson
The Forum at Tucson (134 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Forum at Tucson has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.6 3.2 11 0 0
2023 8.4 8.4 6 0 0
2022 14.1 0.0 14 0 0
2021 5.5 0.9 6 0 0
2020 4.8 1.6 6 0 0
2019 4.3 1.4 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Tucson

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AX-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR APEX 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Larson House 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Pointe Assisted Living of Asheboro 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63065 SUNRISE OF NORTH HILLS 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riverside Ag Harvesting LLC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Directional Drilling 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brand Energy Services, LLC - Phoenix 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Mobile storage 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Charles La 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LWHS LTD dba Bata Plastics, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dominion Crossville, LLC 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Eagle Distributing, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Okc Will Rogers World Airport 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ignite Medical Resort OKC, LLC 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manor of Kenosha 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dutchland, Inc 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.