Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

The Gables of Brighton

Rochester, NY · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Gables of Brighton runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

The Gables of Brighton: 1.2 TCR = 31% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Gables of Brighton safety composite

The Gables of Brighton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Gables of Brighton: 0.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

The Gables of Brighton's TCR rose 4.7 from 0.0 in 2018 to 4.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/283
  • PHOTO Carrollton AL MC Car…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carrollton AL MC Care Properties, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Gables of Brighton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Gables of Brighton averages 1.2 TCR (31% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Gables of Brighton TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=4.7 · BLS 3.8

Where The Gables of Brighton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

The Gables of Brighton (41 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Gables of Brighton
The Gables of Brighton (41 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Gables of Brighton has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Rochester

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carrollton AL MC Care Properties, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Jerseyville 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peterson Meadows 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beam LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAKESIDE ORCHARDS INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martens Fresh, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steam Distribution System 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE OAKWOOD AVENUE CREW LOCATION-NY14 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Jerseyville 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Consolidated Electrical Distributors (Pc1989) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn Shreveport Bossier City 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Basic Management, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fayette Electric Cooperative, inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Coating Solutions, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire - Station 2 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aim Integrated Logistics Inc. Campbell's 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.