Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Pennsylvania

The Gardens at Camp Hill

Camp Hill, PA · ~154 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Gardens at Camp Hill runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade C.

The Gardens at Camp Hill: 5.9 TCR = 91% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Gardens at Camp Hill safety composite

The Gardens at Camp Hill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22026.0

2022→2024

The Gardens at Camp Hill injury rate improved

The Gardens at Camp Hill's TCR fell 22026.0 from 22033.9 in 2022 to 7.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 22033.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=22033.9 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Camp Hill, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #256/754
  • PHOTO The Heights of Tyler
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Heights of Tyler (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Gardens at Camp Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Gardens at Camp Hill averages 5.9 TCR (91% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Gardens at Camp Hill TCR series: 2022=22033.9 · 2023=4 · 2024=7.9 · BLS 6.5

Where The Gardens at Camp Hill falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #256 safest of 754 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Pennsylvania.

The Gardens at Camp Hill (154 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Gardens at Camp Hill
The Gardens at Camp Hill (154 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Gardens at Camp Hill has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 7.9 5 0 0
2023 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2022 22033.9 22033.9 2 11 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Camp Hill

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 107 employers in Camp Hill, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Heights of Tyler 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Health Care 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KING DAVID CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texhoma Christian Care Center, Inc. 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennsy Construction 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE TransCore - T0762 - Harrisburg VPC 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaney Telecom, Inc. - BBNS* 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reading, Pennsylvania 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR A109 - Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center 1,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL 1,723 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrisburg 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vantage Foods PA LP 660 FTE
NAT-TCR Kocher+Beck USA, L.P. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Loen Nursery, Inc. - Woodburn 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Appleton Central 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Texhoma Christian Care Center, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE SAputo Cheese USA Inc 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE AOS staffing office 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bryant Group Inc. 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burt Process equipment 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.