Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials · Ohio

The Garland Company

Cleveland, OH · ~233 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Garland Company runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials workplace, earning a grade D.

The Garland Company: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Garland Company safety composite

The Garland Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.4

2016→2024

The Garland Company injury rate improved

The Garland Company's TCR fell 17.4 from 18.4 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.4 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 324122 · Cleveland, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #11/13
  • PHOTO MFM Building Product…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MFM Building Products Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Garland Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Garland Company averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Garland Company TCR series: 2016=18.4 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where The Garland Company falls in its industry

148 Roofing coatings made from pur establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 13 Roofing coatings made from pur employers in Ohio.

The Garland Company (233 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate The Garland Company
The Garland Company (233 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.2

The Garland Company has more employees than the Roofing coatings made from purchased asp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.5 4 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 6 1 0
2022 1.7 0.8 3 3 0
2021 1.9 0.3 0 7 0
2020 1.4 0.6 2 3 0
2019 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 8.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 8.3 2.8 3 0 0
2016 18.4 9.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

324122 · OH · Cleveland

148 Roofing coatings made from purchased asphaltic materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MFM Building Products Corp. 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOPREMA, Gulfport Manufacturing Plant 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAMKO Building Products LLC - High Street 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAMKO - Green Cove 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland Distribution Center - ABARTA Coca-Cola Beverages 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tosoh SMD - Grove City 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauder Manufacturing Company Archbold Ohio Plant 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR Burkey Corporation 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peninsula Light Company 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2456 - Otsego 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Boxed Meat Portland 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oregon Beverage Recycling Cooperative - Clackamas 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Roads District Complex 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forte Power Systems 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buchanan General Hospital 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.