Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

The Grand Hills Castle

New Berlin, WI · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Grand Hills Castle runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Grand Hills Castle: 7.5 TCR = 199% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Grand Hills Castle safety composite

The Grand Hills Castle scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Grand Hills Castle: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

The Grand Hills Castle's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · New Berlin, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 199% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #176/273
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY NORWOO…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY NORWOOD OPERATION LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

The Grand Hills Castle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Grand Hills Castle averages 7.5 TCR (199% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Grand Hills Castle TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=15.8 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Grand Hills Castle falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #176 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

The Grand Hills Castle (62 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Grand Hills Castle
The Grand Hills Castle (62 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Grand Hills Castle has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2023 15.8 9.5 4 1 0
2022 9.1 9.1 4 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2020 11.8 11.8 5 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · New Berlin

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 183 employers in New Berlin, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY NORWOOD OPERATION LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augustana The Pines 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5705 - Colonial Village 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF LEESBURG 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Catalyst Construction 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Construction Solutions Inc 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE AM Construction Services, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chilstrom Erecting 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pieper Electric, Inc. 1,154 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5531 502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Office 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR KS Energy Services (New Berlin) 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Trans-System Inc - Caldwell 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Norwood Operation LLC 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR S03174 - MN Fairmont 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 2015 - Salinas 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #82 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runnings of Willmar 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runnings of Rome 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE CoreFX Ingredients 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.