Skilled nursing facilities · New York

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens

Whitestone, NY · ~244 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens: 13.7 TCR = 210% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens safety composite

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens: 7.0 → 22.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 22.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens's TCR rose 15.6 from 7.0 in 2021 to 22.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Whitestone, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 210% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #526/616
  • PHOTO Life Care Center of …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~244 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Life Care Center of Kennewick (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens averages 13.7 TCR (210% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens TCR series: 2021=7 · 2023=11.4 · 2024=22.6 · BLS 6.5

Where The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #526 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens (244 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens
The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens (244 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Grand Rehabilitation & Nursing at Queens has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.6 7.9 37 0 0
2023 11.4 0.7 17 0 0
2021 7.0 4.2 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Whitestone

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 19 employers in Whitestone, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Kennewick 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fox Subacute Center 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flowers Manor 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beechwood Health Care Center 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taconic Biosciences, Inc. Germantown Facility 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Fuel Gas Distribution Mineral Springs Servicenter 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE New York NY Svc Tmobile 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saputo Dairy Foods USA 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kinray 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridge View Nursing Home 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR TC Electric 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR D.D.S. MECHANICAL PLUMBING & HEATING CORP. 113 FTE
NAT-TCR WAS026 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ILS001 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR QCIA Airport Services, L.L.C. 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big City Insulation of Idaho 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Todd & Sargent 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2532 - Hanover 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1374 - Seekonk 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1085 - Cherry Hill 244 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.