Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Florida

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc.

Pensacola, FL · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 48% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. safety composite

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2019

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Pensacola, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 48% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #92/218
  • PHOTO GC Charlotte - Cleve…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GC Charlotte - Cleveland Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (48% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2019=2.8 · BLS 2.9

Where The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 218 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Florida.

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate The Green-Simmons Company, Inc.
The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

The Green-Simmons Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · FL · Pensacola

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 448 employers in Pensacola, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GC Charlotte - Cleveland Construction 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR purcell construction inc. Virginia 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schnell Contractors, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multnomah County Bldg 274/Prophet Building 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE WAWA SITE - 5391 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foley Products Company Cantonment 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landscape Resources 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeview Center 2,820 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLPEN36 ASCENSION SACRED HEART PENSACOLA HOSP 2,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-FLPEN36 2,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pensacola Christian College, Inc. 2,259 FTE
NAT-TCR Cheyenne Transitional Ctr 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Impact Fire Services (Houston Office) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix (PHX) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NB Coatings Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rollin'R Enterprises, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crosswood Oaks 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Waterford at Ames 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Siri Produce Inc. (Jack) 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.