Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction · Pennsylvania

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree

Lancaster, PA · ~113 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree: 1.5 TCR = 51% of Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree safety composite

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree: 0.9 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.41× in 2023

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree's TCR rose 1.2 from 0.9 in 2022 to 2.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Lancaster, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 51% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #56/251
  • PHOTO Fahs Construction Gr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fahs Construction Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree averages 1.5 TCR (51% of the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree TCR series: 2022=0.9 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 2.9

Where The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and inst establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 251 Warehouse, commercial and inst employers in Pennsylvania.

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree (113 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree
The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree (113 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree has more employees than the Warehouse, commercial and institutional, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Lancaster

4,692 Warehouse, commercial and institutional, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fahs Construction Group 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1157 - BELFOR Austin TX 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weitz Industrial Services, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harris Construction Co., Inc. 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Constellation Power Labs 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE FARMER BOY AG INC 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conway Phillips Holding, LLC 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allegheny Contracting 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR HS Norcross 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry Global MONC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Berger Transfer & Storage, Inc- Dallas 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wavestream 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Complete Packaging LLC 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE PDS Consultants Inc #11 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Metal Buyers 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garland, Tx 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.