Family social service agencies · Minnesota

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing

Minneapolis, MN · ~45 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing runs at 479% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Family social service agencies workplace, earning a grade F.

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing: 18.2 TCR = 479% of Family social service agencies BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing safety composite

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2022→2024

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing injury rate improved

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing's TCR fell 7.2 from 14.7 in 2022 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 32.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=14.7 · 2023=32.4 · 2024=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.2 · 479% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #78/79
  • PHOTO HW Harlem
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HW Harlem (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing averages 18.2 TCR (479% of the Family social service agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing TCR series: 2022=14.7 · 2023=32.4 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing falls in its industry

990 Family social service agencies establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 79 Family social service agencies employers in Minnesota.

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing (45 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing
The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing (45 employees, TCR 18.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

The Harman Center for Child and Family Wellbeing has fewer employees than the Family social service agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 0.0 2 0 0
2023 32.4 7.2 6 3 0
2022 14.7 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MN · Minneapolis

990 Family social service agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HW Harlem 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BayPointe Hospitals 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10541 Drummond Rd 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR YDI Valencia 18.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE District 45 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allstar Construction Commercial Op Co, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doran Construction Company, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hasslen Construction Company, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets - Edmonds 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0352 OREM 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Driven2Deliver, LLC 18.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor House at Canfield 18.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ARC Drilling LLC 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Plastics MONROE 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adrian Steel of Kansas City 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Pomp Studios 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.