Commercial building construction general contractors · New York

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation

Syracuse, NY · ~103 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation: 3.5 TCR = 120% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation safety composite

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation injury rate improved

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation's TCR fell 1.6 from 4.1 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.7 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #152/218
  • PHOTO Zelham, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Zelham, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hayner Hoyt Corporation averages 3.5 TCR (120% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.7 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.9

Where The Hayner Hoyt Corporation falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 218 Commercial building constructi employers in New York.

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation (103 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hayner Hoyt Corporation
The Hayner Hoyt Corporation (103 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

The Hayner Hoyt Corporation has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2019 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.1 5.0 8 0 0
2016 4.1 2.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Syracuse

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Zelham, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robertson Construction 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.A. Bentley Construction 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolverine Building Group 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Christie Avenue Reporting Ctr. 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cedar Creek 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mclo Structural Steel Corp. 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse), Inc. - DBA ABJ Fire Protection 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR Crown Harvesting Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Solid 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 752 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bristol Farms - 015 - BF Westwood 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bland County Nursing and Rehab 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Plata Electric Association 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Team Select Home Care - SNA 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deer Park Roofing LLC 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.