Skilled nursing facilities · Colorado

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs

Colorado Springs, CO · ~143 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs: 4.2 TCR = 65% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs safety composite

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs: 0.0 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.26× in 2024

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs's TCR rose 8.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #42/259
  • PHOTO Royal Oaks Nursing a…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs averages 4.2 TCR (65% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2022=3.4 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 6.5

Where The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Colorado.

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs (143 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs
The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs (143 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 5.3 13 0 0
2022 3.4 0.0 6 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 4 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 9.7 2.4 8 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CO · Colorado Springs

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehab Center 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hildebrand Care Center 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rehab Center of Bakersfield 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westmoreland at CareCore 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colorado Powerline Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope, Inc - Denver 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tharp Cabinet Company 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4598-RTC DENVER 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Brattleboro Memorial Hospital 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 101 Airline Dr Metairie La 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4131 Lancaster Pa 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Ellisville District 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 55357 Lawrence 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2019 Coborn's Princeton 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baker Manufacturing Company LLC 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meco Constructors, Inc. 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.