Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Texas

The Heights of Atascosa

Pleasanton, TX · ~99 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Heights of Atascosa runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

The Heights of Atascosa: 10.6 TCR = 163% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Heights of Atascosa safety composite

The Heights of Atascosa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Heights of Atascosa: 1.5 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 35.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.32× in 2024

The Heights of Atascosa's TCR rose 3.5 from 1.5 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 35.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pleasanton, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.6 · 163% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #962/1034
  • PHOTO LP Marietta II, LLC …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~99 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Marietta II, LLC (Tower Road) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

The Heights of Atascosa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Heights of Atascosa averages 10.6 TCR (163% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Heights of Atascosa TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=20.7 · 2021=35.9 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=5 · BLS 6.5

Where The Heights of Atascosa falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #962 safest of 1034 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Texas.

The Heights of Atascosa (99 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Heights of Atascosa
The Heights of Atascosa (99 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Heights of Atascosa has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 3.4 3 0 0
2023 10.6 1.8 5 1 0
2022 3.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 35.9 8.4 14 3 0
2020 20.7 11.0 7 8 0
2019 13.2 0.0 10 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2017 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2016 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Pleasanton

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 22 employers in Pleasanton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Marietta II, LLC (Tower Road) 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedrock Rehabilitation & Nursing Center at Lake Eustis 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haven of Flagstaff, LLC 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Good Samaritan Home & Rehab 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE TXMCF 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrews Brigade Energy Services 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enphase Energy Austin TX 99 FTE
STATE-SIZE JLB Partners, LP 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Yard 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pumpco Energy Services, Inc-Pleasanton 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR CMS Pleasanton 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR 757 256 FTE
NAT-TCR NRG 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NJRHS - Wall 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Norwich Store 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR QVC, Inc. (Ontario) 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kimble Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Canton 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fireline Inc. 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper Henderson Mill 99 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Division 99 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.