Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Nebraska

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens

Columbus, NE · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens: 3.3 TCR = 87% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens safety composite

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2018→2023

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens injury rate improved

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.8 · 2019=6.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/66
  • PHOTO 10062
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10062 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Heritage at Meridian Gardens averages 3.3 TCR (87% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens TCR series: 2018=3.8 · 2019=6.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Heritage at Meridian Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 66 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nebraska.

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens (75 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Heritage at Meridian Gardens
The Heritage at Meridian Gardens (75 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Heritage at Meridian Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.2 6.2 3 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NE · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 91 employers in Columbus, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10062 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Creek 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60029 MAPLEWOOD PARK PLACE 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 415-Heritage Lake Country 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Superior Lighting Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS Precision Manufacturing 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highline Warren Council Bluffs DC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE FAREWAY STORES, INC. 118 NEBRASKA CITY 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus West 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Pharmaceutical Systems 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Community Hospital 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus East 762 FTE
NAT-TCR Sun Commodities, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alfa Laval Inc. Chesapeake (loc code: VACHES) 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugar Steel Corporation 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2962 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Red Bluff Healthcare Center 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tommy House Tire Co 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCL Label Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doubletree New Orleans Airport 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.