Homes for the elderly with nursing care · New York

The Hurlbut LLC

Rochester, NY · ~197 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hurlbut LLC runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade B.

The Hurlbut LLC: 4.5 TCR = 70% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hurlbut LLC safety composite

The Hurlbut LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2016→2024

The Hurlbut LLC injury rate improved

The Hurlbut LLC's TCR fell 9.0 from 9.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.5 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #226/616
  • PHOTO St. Johnsville Rehab…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Johnsville Rehab and Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Hurlbut LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hurlbut LLC averages 4.5 TCR (70% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hurlbut LLC TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where The Hurlbut LLC falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #226 safest of 616 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in New York.

The Hurlbut LLC (197 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hurlbut LLC
The Hurlbut LLC (197 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Hurlbut LLC has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.7 5.5 7 0 0
2022 7.5 6.3 6 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.3 0.7 1 1 0
2019 2.9 2.3 5 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 7 0 0
2017 7.8 6.6 13 0 0
2016 9.0 7.9 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Rochester

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Johnsville Rehab and Nursing Center 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Borderview Rehabilitation & Living Center 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glen Oaks Health Campus 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR StoneBridge Hermann 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pine Pharmaceuticals, 355 Riverwalk 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safeway Construction Enterprises LLC 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Almar Plumbing & Heating Corp 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE MASPETH NY (PAGE PL) DEPOT 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR 057-MSN 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hardy Chevrolet Buick GMC Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Village Travel Wichita 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors Miami 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE NHC Healthcare North Augusta 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Synergy, LLC 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breakthru Beverage South Carolina - Ridgeway 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westlake Pipe & Fittings 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.