Electric contracting · North Carolina

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric contracting workplace, earning a grade A.

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Electric contracting BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte safety composite

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2019

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #24/108
  • PHOTO EC Company - Intel
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EC Company - Intel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Electric contracting BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte falls in its industry

4,550 Electric contracting establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 108 Electric contracting employers in North Carolina.

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte (48 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte
The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte (48 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

The Industrial Electric Company of Charlotte has fewer employees than the Electric contracting median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NC · Charlotte

4,550 Electric contracting employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EC Company - Intel 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Western Communications Corporate 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles Office 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The State Group Industrial USA Limited - Division 48 Wisconsin 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jones Family Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bryan Wagoner Tree Farm LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeder Operation 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Morganton Hatchery 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Philips 175 Kennesaw 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Reddy Ice - Landover (427) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Prolong Pharmaceuticals -- Cragwood Suites 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nissan Technical Center Sacramento 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Distribution Center 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Haven Store 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Lumber Conroe 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seatrade north 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.