Homes for the aged with nursing care · New York

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center

Troy, NY · ~164 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade B.

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center: 4.8 TCR = 74% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center safety composite

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center: 3.7 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2022

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center's TCR rose 2.2 from 3.7 in 2021 to 5.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Troy, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.8 · 74% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #242/616
  • PHOTO Columbine Commons He…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbine Commons Health and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center averages 4.8 TCR (74% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center TCR series: 2021=3.7 · 2022=5.9 · BLS 6.5

Where The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #242 safest of 616 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in New York.

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center (164 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center
The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center (164 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The James A Eddy Memorial Geriatric Center has more employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.9 5.0 7 0 0
2021 3.7 0.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Troy

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 97 employers in Troy, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbine Commons Health and Rehab 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pine Ridge Extended Care Center 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MercyOne North Iowa Hospice 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillview Healthcare Center 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crestwood Childrens Center 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1001 South Oyster Bay Rd 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6440 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPER STOP & SHOP 0558 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Peter's Health Partners/ Samaritan Hospital 2,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Hospital 1,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Hospital-Troy-SPHP-NY 1,466 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital- Troy/Seton Health 807 FTE
NAT-TCR SchaeferRolls, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 546020-Oak Harbor Po 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 480409-Aus-Lake Travis Sta 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 483260-Fredericksburg Po 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ShopRite of Canton 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-10D8164 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2967-MA148 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal CG -Tumwater CG 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.