Janitorial services · Alabama

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping)

Birmingham, AL · ~32 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade A.

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping): 0.9 TCR = 21% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) safety composite

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) held a steady TCR band

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Birmingham, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/70
  • PHOTO CBRE Eli Lilly
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CBRE Eli Lilly (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) averages 0.9 TCR (21% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 70 Janitorial services employers in Alabama.

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) (32 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping)
The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) (32 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital (Housekeeping) has fewer employees than the Janitorial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AL · Birmingham

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 840 employers in Birmingham, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CBRE Eli Lilly 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Regional Health Cente 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp - BBS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMI / Custodial Dept. at LANL 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ider Live Operations 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur Fresh Hatchery 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrims Pride - Hatchery 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headland Business Office/Crew Headquarters 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR USD 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLASSIC FOODS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIRMINGHAM PACKERS 8,650 FTE
NAT-TCR Telog Instruments, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR OSC,Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LLS Bakersfield 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sidney Grain Handling Facility 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Virgina American Water - Alexandria District 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axcesor Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vernon Sal, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covenant Place of Burleson 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.