Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local · Connecticut

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO.

Meriden, CT · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local workplace, earning a grade C.

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO.: 5.1 TCR = 113% of Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. safety composite

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO.: 3.1 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.63× in 2024

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO.'s TCR rose 5.1 from 3.1 in 2020 to 8.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Meriden, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.1 · 113% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO Team Logistics Corpo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Team Logistics Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. averages 5.1 TCR (113% of the Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. TCR series: 2020=3.1 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 4.5

Where The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. falls in its industry

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Trucking, specialized freight employers in Connecticut.

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. (37 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO.
The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. (37 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

The L. SUZIO CONSTRUCTION CO. has fewer employees than the Trucking, specialized freight (except us median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2023 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · CT · Meriden

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 115 employers in Meriden, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Team Logistics Corporate 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milk Marketing - MAC - Greeley CO 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cumming Live Haul 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transystems LLC - Summer Construction Hauling Project 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Affinity Grow 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - New Britain 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - East Windsor 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loureiro Contractors, Inc. 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDSTATE MEDICAL CENTER 1,220 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRDNCT04 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radio Frequency Systems - Meriden, CT 402 FTE
NAT-TCR Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority Duffield Facility 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0508 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1118 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1567 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Millenia Store #113 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rusnak Hyundai Loma Linda 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE RIP - Residential Institutional Probation 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Novi 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.