Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

The Landings of Rockingham

Reidsville, NC · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Landings of Rockingham runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Landings of Rockingham: 5.6 TCR = 148% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Landings of Rockingham safety composite

The Landings of Rockingham scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Landings of Rockingham: 0.0 → 12.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

The Landings of Rockingham's TCR rose 12.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 12.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Reidsville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 148% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #168/356
  • PHOTO CELEBRATION VILLAS O…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CELEBRATION VILLAS OF SUMMIT HILLS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Landings of Rockingham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Landings of Rockingham averages 5.6 TCR (148% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Landings of Rockingham TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=12.7 · BLS 3.8

Where The Landings of Rockingham falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

The Landings of Rockingham (22 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Landings of Rockingham
The Landings of Rockingham (22 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Landings of Rockingham has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.7 4.2 2 1 0
2023 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Reidsville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 60 employers in Reidsville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLAS OF SUMMIT HILLS 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Monterey 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maplewood, Elmcroft of 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Naples 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE A Plus Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Ridge Farms Partnership 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanguard Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LNM - 105 -EST 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR De Oro Foods, DBA Dorada Foods, LLC 438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dorada Foods Reidsville 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henniges Automotive 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3304 301 FTE
NAT-TCR DCG Machine, Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 15VA - Enterprise Leasing Company of Chicago, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McCoy Iron & Metal, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ryerson Indianapolis Indiana 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Angola Operating Hqtrs-Ny33 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosara Investments, LLC Ea06 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warrensburg Service Center-Ny21 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.